The case talked about in PLJ 1997 SC 985 involved a declaration that respondents, becoming co-sharers, were being entrepreneurs in the land. The go well with was initially dismissed, but on appeal, it had been decreed in favor on the respondents. It could, but only for a long time. Would https://co-ownership-and-partitio55192.designertoblog.com/62597878/5-simple-techniques-for-easements-and-rights-of-way-advocate-in-karachi